Oakland Tribune

 

Article:    “Judge tosses Oak-to-Ninth impact report”   By Kelly Rayburn  (11-21-07)

 

Article:    “Oak-to-Ninth opponents drop suit against Oakland”   By Kelly Rayburn  (11-09-07)

 

Letters:    “Oak-to-Ninth facts that were left out of article”   By Michael Rubin (09-08-07)

 

Letters:    ”Oak to Ninth plan should emulate Seattle“   By David Mix (09-04-07)

 

My Word: “Oak to Ninth opponents denying reality”    By Mike Ghielmetti (09-01-07)

 

My Word: “First Amendment provides for petitioners' rights”    By Akio Tanaka (08-28-07)

 

Letters:    “It's not the petitions that should be disqualified”   By Pamela Weber (08-25-07)

 

Article:    “Oak-to-Ninth foes rally”   By Kelly Rayburn  (08-18-07)

 

Letters:    “Will of people still unheeded on Oak-to-Ninth project”   By Jan Arnold (08-15-07)

 

Letters:    “Why doesn’t city count those signatures?”   By Kate Tanaka (08-10-07)

 

My Word: “Once the waterfront is gone, it’s gone forever”    By Akio Tanaka (04-11-07)

 

Letters:    “Council should be held to same rules”   By Jan Arnold (04-09-07)

 

Letters:    “Money still talks”   By Michael Rubin (04-06-07)

 

Letters:   “City attorney’s logic questioned”   By  Anne Silver (04-05-07)

 

My Word: “A different interpretation of the Oak to Ninth petition squabble”  By Stuart Flashman (03-30-07)

 

My Word: “Referendum committee leaders failed the public”    By John Russo (03-29-07)

 

My Word: “Seeking redress on 'Oak to Ninth' plan”      By Kate Tanaka (03-24-07)

 

 

Eastbay Express

 

Full Disclosure: “Referendum Wins a Round”     By Robert Gammon  (07-25-07)

 

Full Disclosure: “My Fair Lady”  [on Don Perata]    By Robert Gammon  (05-30-07)

 

Full Disclosure: “Living Large ”  [on Don Perata]    By Robert Gammon  (05-23-07)

 

Letters:   “Check the record”    By  Michael Hardesty (05-09-07)

 

Full Disclosure: “Oak to Ninth Ying-Yang”    By Robert Gammon (04-25-07)

 

Letters:   “The Dog Ate His Homework”    By Pam Weber and Joyce Roy (04-11-07)

 

Water Cooler: “Flashy Signature: Oak to Ninth foes decry developer's positive-spin mailer”   By Robert Gammon  (04-11-07)

 

Letter:    “Disservice to readers”     By David L. Roth (03-13-07)

 

Full Disclosure: “Russo Versus the People”      By Robert Gammon  (02-21-07)

 

 

Grand Lake Guardian

 

Commentary: “Court overturn’s City’s approval of Oak-to-Ninth Project” By Jim Ratliff   (11-20-07)

 

Commentary: “Oak-to-Ninth ruling leaves Ninth Avenue Terminal under a cloud” By Jim Ratliff   (11-20-07)

 

Commentary: “Quagmire on the Estuary”  By Pamela Drake   (07-22-07)

 

 

Montclarion

 

Letters : “City Council can now get it right”    By James E Vann   (11-22-07)

 

Article:  “Oak-to-Ninth plan needs new environmental report”   By Kelly Rayburn  (11-21-07)

 

Article:  “News Brief”   By Kelly Rayburn  (11-16-07)

 

Guest Commentary:  “Oak to Ninth project raises vexing issues”   By Akio Tanaka  (09-07-07)

 

Letters : “Waterfront is worth the fight”    By Pam Webb   (08-31-07)

 

Letters : “We had a beautiful plan”  By Katie Fahey    (08-31-07)

 

Letters : “We’re just exercising our rights”     By Kate Tanaka   (08-31-07)

 

Letters : “Oakland residents need to move on”    By Leslie Ann Jones   (08-24-07)

 

Letters:  “Russo needs to recount signatures”    By Suzanne Sargentini  (08-24-07)

 

Letters : “25,000 waterfront fans can’t be wrong”    By Kate Tanaka  (08-17-07)

 

Letters : “Let residents speak on development”    By Janet Arnold  (08-17-07)

 

Letters : “Don’t give waterfront to developer”    By Akio Tanaka (04-27-07)

 

Letters : “Stick to enforcing the law”    By Kate Tanaka (04-20-07)

 

Letters : “Flawed process for project’s approval”     By Wilson Riles (04-20-07)

 

Letters : “Letters obscured facts”      By Erica Harrold (04-20-07)

 

Letters : “Russo does developer's bidding”      By Jane Powell (03-30--07)

 

Guest Commentary:  “Staff pushed council to decide too hastily”   By Stuart Flashman  (03-30-07)

 

Guest Commentary: “Voters need protection of full disclosure laws”    By John Russo  (03-23-07)

 

Guest Commentary: “Justice in Oakland has a high price tag”  By Kate Tanaka  (03-16-07)

 

 

Berkeley Daily Planet

 

Article:    “Judge Throws Out Oak-to-9th Plan EIR”  By Douglas Allen-Taylor (11-23-07)

 

Article:   “Oak-to-Ninth Referendum Lawsuit Dropped for Lack of Funds” By Douglas Allen-Taylor (11-13-07)

 

Commentary: “Oak-to-Ninth Referendum Raises Democratic Issues”   By  Akio Tanaka (08-24-07)

 

Article: “Oak-to-Ninth Dispute Moves Forward in Superior Court”   By Douglas Allen-Taylor (04-24-07)

 

Commentary: “Oak-to-Ninth: A New Oakland or Oakland of the Old”  By Akio Tanaka (04-10-07)

 

Letters: “OAK-TO-NINTH REFERENDUM”      By Jane Powell (04-06-07)

 

Commentary: “Challenging Russo’s View of ‘Oak to Ninth’”     By Stuart Flashman (04-03-07)

 

Letters: “OAKLAND WATERFRONT”    By Pamela Weber (03-20-07)

 

Commentary: “Oakland’s Waterfront Deserves a Better Plan”  By Akio Tanaka (03-16-07)

 

 

 

San Francisco Chronicle

 

Article:    “Judge rules Oak-to-Ninth project environmental review inadequate”  By Christopher Heredia (11-23-07)

 

Article:    “Lawsuit withdrawn on housing project”  By Christopher Heredia (11-10-07)

 

Commentary: “No end in sight for war over Oakland’s Oak to 9th”    By Chip Johnson (05-25-07)